fix: fixed autoscaling configs in deployments api

[dulaj-me]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

✱ Stainless preview builds

This PR will update the togetherai SDKs with the following commit message.

fix: fixed autoscaling configs in deployments api

Edit this comment to update it. It will appear in the SDK's changelogs.

⏳ togetherai-go studio · code · diff

generate ✅ → build ⏳ → lint ✅ → test ✅

go get github.com/stainless-sdks/togetherai-go@5dd8625c2d03e52647f471ed55f7856f3617136c

New diagnostics (11 note)

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/HTTPAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/QueueAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/CustomMetricAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Schema/EnumHasOneMember: This enum schema has just one member, so it could be defined using [`const`](https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/const).

💡 Schema/EnumHasOneMember: This enum schema has just one member, so it could be defined using [`const`](https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/const).

💡 Schema/EnumHasOneMember: This enum schema has just one member, so it could be defined using [`const`](https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/const).

💡 Schema/EnumHasOneMember: This enum schema has just one member, so it could be defined using [`const`](https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/const).

💡 Schema/EnumHasOneMember: This enum schema has just one member, so it could be defined using [`const`](https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/const).

💡 Schema/EnumHasOneMember: This enum schema has just one member, so it could be defined using [`const`](https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/const).

💡 Go/SchemaUnionDiscriminatorMissing: This union schema has more than one object variant, but no [`discriminator`](https://www.stainless.com/docs/reference/openapi-support#discriminator) property, so deserializing the union may be inefficient or ambiguous.

✅ togetherai-typescript studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

npm install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/togetherai-typescript/44c9a5f2927519da73cef3d336b58adb5d627a9e/dist.tar.gz

New diagnostics (3 note)

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/HTTPAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/QueueAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/CustomMetricAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

⏳ togetherai-python studio · code · diff

generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ❗ (prev: lint ✅) → test ⏳

pip install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/togetherai-python/44280bcf6f35302c80ef6cec35ddf178dee1e055/together-2.2.0-py3-none-any.whl

New diagnostics (3 note)

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/HTTPAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/QueueAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/CustomMetricAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

✅ togetherai-openapi studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️

New diagnostics (3 note)

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/HTTPAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/QueueAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/CustomMetricAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

✅ togetherai-terraform studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → lint ❗ → test ❗

New diagnostics (3 note)

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/HTTPAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/QueueAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

💡 Model/Recommended: `#/components/schemas/CustomMetricAutoscalingConfig` could potentially be defined as a [model](https://www.stainless.com/docs/guides/configure#models) within `#/resources/beta/subresources/jig`.

⏳ These are partial results; builds are still running.

---

This comment is auto-generated by GitHub Actions and is automatically kept up to date as you push.
If you push custom code to the preview branch, re-run this workflow to update the comment.
Last updated: 2026-02-27 14:57:08 UTC