short alternatives for estimator names#185
Open
SermetPekin wants to merge 4 commits intoigerber:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Method name(s): N/A — no estimator logic or math changed
Paper / source link(s): N/A
Any intentional deviations from the source (and why): N/A
Validation
Tests added/updated: Added test_aliases.py with 4 tests verifying aliases are identical objects (is), present in all, and importable
Backtest / simulation / notebook evidence (if applicable): N/A — aliases are simple assignments, no behavioral change
Security / privacy
Confirm no secrets/PII in this PR: Confirmed — no secrets or PII. Changes are limited to name bindings in init.py and a new test file.