Skip to content

Remove Financials from Active Chair line of succession#280

Open
TheParadoxBox wants to merge 1 commit intoComputerScienceHouse:masterfrom
TheParadoxBox:master
Open

Remove Financials from Active Chair line of succession#280
TheParadoxBox wants to merge 1 commit intoComputerScienceHouse:masterfrom
TheParadoxBox:master

Conversation

@TheParadoxBox
Copy link

@TheParadoxBox TheParadoxBox commented Feb 26, 2026

See that awful thread from 2025-02-26 in #constitution

Check one:

  • Semantic Change: something about the meaning of the text is different
  • Non-semantic Change: Spelling, grammar, or formatting changes.

Summary of change(s):

Financials has been removed from the line of succession for Acting Chair; it is now just Evals, then any voting EBoard member, as chosen by an EBoard vote. The reason for this is that while the responsibilities of Evals generally align with those of the Chair (interface with RIT, lead discussions), Financials doesn't need to be as good at leading complex meetings like House Meeting, EBoard Meeting, or Spring Evals. In these situations, EBoard should be allowed to pick a different chair of the discussion than Financials. If Chair is unavailable long-term, a new Chair should be elected instead (and therefore the Acting Chair line of succession is ignored).

See that awful thread from 2025-02-26 in #constitution
@pikachu0542
Copy link
Member

If Chair is unavailable long-term, an interim Chair should be selected instead (and therefore the Acting Chair line of succession is ignored).

Just want to mention that interim chair is not actually a thing that we do. I was the one that initially mentioned interim chair in the giant thread, so my bad. But just want to clarify that. If there is a long term need for an acting chairperson, then we would run an election for a new chairperson.

@pikachu0542
Copy link
Member

Not gonna give my own opinion here bc i think we have covered that enough in the Slack thread, but I think this is a reasonable proposal and I see the merits of it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With only 2 items in the list, I think it would make more sense to just remove the list formatting and just incorporate it into the existing paragraph. Not sure off the top of my head how we could phrase that, though

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought about removing the list formatting, but this was ultimately the reason I left it. Once I finish my work for today, though, I'll take another look.

@TheParadoxBox
Copy link
Author

Just want to mention that interim chair is not actually a thing that we do.

Noted. My original message has been edited to specify electing a new Chair instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants